Glenn T. Stanton makes various hilariously ridiculous arguments that shows he has no concept of Due Process, judicial hearings, basic logic, or common sense. I wish I could take the time to include the entire passage here, but I'll settle for one passage that really highlights his ignorance.
In fact, Sosman concludes, the court “is persuaded that there are no differences between same-sex and opposite-sex couples” (emphasis added). But can any husband, wife, or child admit that his or her spouse or parent could be replaced by someone of any sex? Is emotional attachment all there is to these relationships? (p. 73)I think the question is misleading, because it asks an even more fundamental question: "Can any husband, wife, or child admit that his or her spouse or parent could be replaced by someone?"
Indeed, they cannot! And how does a same-sex couple feel about their spouses or children? Perhaps the same? Or perhaps the children feel the same way about their parents?
In his quest to argue against same-sex marriages, Stanton finds himself accidentally arguing for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment